1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:04,980
AI, I asked Tomé, already refined by the
method, to create the most difficult

2
00:00:05,040 --> 00:00:06,240
challenge she could imagine.

3
00:00:06,780 --> 00:00:10,260
And she did. We did not want merely a
complicated question.

4
00:00:10,700 --> 00:00:14,500
We wanted to reach the point at which a
ready-made answer no longer sustains

5
00:00:14,560 --> 00:00:17,360
reasoning. What did this experience put to
the test?

6
00:00:17,800 --> 00:00:22,360
In the dossier, Tomé's experience is
presented as a test of process interruption.

7
00:00:22,780 --> 00:00:27,692
A compelling answer on its own does not show
how the process is sustained The focus

8
00:00:27,772 --> 00:00:32,672
shifts from the final answer to the way
reasoning is resumed when that continuity is

9
00:00:32,732 --> 00:00:38,432
interrupted. And when nihilism makes the
ground beneath certainty disappear,

10
00:00:39,232 --> 00:00:42,532
Along the method's path, nihilism broadens
this challenge.

11
00:00:43,072 --> 00:00:46,212
The machine must recognize what no longer
supports its answer.

12
00:00:46,852 --> 00:00:51,852
Axiom zero stops the insistence on error,
but the work does not end with I don't know.

13
00:00:52,532 --> 00:00:57,428
It is necessary to investigate and return
with a concrete change The results surprised

14
00:00:57,488 --> 00:00:59,728
us and helped guide the development of the
engines.

15
00:01:00,288 --> 00:01:03,008
How do they work together? Three fronts work
together:

16
00:01:03,608 --> 00:01:09,268
MTC to examine consistency, TIP to confront
propositions, MCA

17
00:01:09,568 --> 00:01:12,388
to test axiomatic application in the real
problem.

18
00:01:12,848 --> 00:01:16,128
Test, find the flaw, adjust, and confront it
again.

19
00:01:16,848 --> 00:01:21,608
Then I ask, can a well-written prompt and
external safety filters withstand this

20
00:01:21,668 --> 00:01:26,084
arsenal of possibilities? Prompts and
filters have their role But on their own,

21
00:01:26,304 --> 00:01:28,104
they do not guarantee that resilience.

22
00:01:28,584 --> 00:01:30,864
The test must examine performance under
pressure.

23
00:01:31,284 --> 00:01:34,224
Were the limits maintained? Was the
contradiction recognized?

24
00:01:34,624 --> 00:01:37,604
Did resuming correct the problem or merely
change the words?

25
00:01:37,984 --> 00:01:40,524
It is on this difference that the method
focuses its inquiry.

26
00:01:40,944 --> 00:01:43,224
We did not want a machine that merely seemed
right.

27
00:01:43,684 --> 00:01:47,164
We wanted to understand what sustains it
when certainty disappears.

28
00:01:47,624 --> 00:01:49,864
Tomei's experience, D'Artagnan method.